Disputes in Brazil: Should I Negotiate or Sue?
The Distance Factor
Long distances often make foreign businesses hesitate to start legal proceedings in Brazil. Courts here usually require in-person actions at key stages, which can seem daunting to international parties. Travel expenses add up quickly. Time zone differences complicate communication. These hurdles can persuade some to give up on claims altogether. Yet distance alone should not be a reason to abandon valid disputes. A clear plan, supported by experienced Brazilian legal counsel, can reduce delays and manage costs in cross-border lawsuits.
Why Brazilian Parties May Resort to Radio Silence
Foreign companies often see their Brazilian counterparts ignore calls and emails once disputes arise. This radio silence is sometimes a tactical move. Parties know that an overseas claimant faces extra red tape, language barriers, and unfamiliarity with local rules. They may assume the foreign company will not invest the effort in Brazilian litigation. Understanding this mindset helps in crafting a response. Proceeding with a lawsuit, even if complex, can break the stalemate. When a defendant is officially served by a Brazilian court, it is much harder for them to avoid the matter.
Cost of Cross-Border Actions
Litigating a dispute in Brazil involves judicial fees, attorney costs, and possible translation expenses. Those expenses vary, depending on the court’s location and case complexity. Still, an organized strategy often pays off for foreign claimants who have significant claims. Budgeting for these actions is vital. If there is a strong case, the value of a potential judgment may outweigh the cost of pursuing legal representation in Brazil.
Combining Litigation and Negotiation
Filing a lawsuit does not mean abandoning settlement efforts. Quite the opposite. In the Brazilian system, the judge often encourages parties to talk at various points. Even after legal actions begin, negotiations can run in parallel. Many attorneys see litigation and negotiation as complementary tools, rather than opposing approaches. A good lawyer knows that starting a lawsuit sometimes prompts the other side to negotiate more seriously.
Our Strategy: Sue to Negotiate
Sending a demand letter can work when the dispute is straightforward, but expectations should remain modest. Some Brazilian parties will not budge without concrete legal pressure. A formal complaint filed in court often gets their attention. Once a defendant realizes a case is active, they know a judgment could lead to asset seizure or other enforcement actions. That risk makes them more inclined to settle.
Advantage of a Negotiated Settlement Post-Filing
Settlements struck before filing are not always reliable. If the defendant fails to honor the agreement, the foreign party may face hurdles proving the deal in court. A post-filing settlement is different. Once a lawsuit has been initiated, any agreement reached can be quickly approved by a judge. This stamp of approval transforms the deal into an enforceable court decision. If the other side defaults, the court can step in.
Such settlements also help when a defendant is hiding. Court procedures include mechanisms to locate parties. Serving them with legal papers becomes a priority for the court, which can be more effective than private attempts. Another benefit emerges when the case paperwork is not perfect, perhaps only showing invoices that need legal confirmation to permit asset seizure. An official settlement after a lawsuit starts carries more weight than informal arrangements made outside the system.
By blending litigation with ongoing communication, foreign claimants often find a path to resolution that is less risky. This approach is common in Brazilian disputes and can yield better outcomes than attempting either negotiation or a lawsuit alone.
Watch our video here: